From a CO in Dept of Education and Science, you might find it interesting
NOTE: The CO is a post 1995 recruit (6.5% pension contribution)
"I am writing to express my outrage at the Pensions Levy this Government proposes to impose on civil and public servants.
I would like to point out the following information:
-The 2nd Benchmarking Report in 2008 resulted in 300,000 public servants and 100,000 retired public servants receiving a pay award of 0%. This report stated a discount of up to 12.5% was applied because of pension entitlement.
-Because this was not highlighted by the Trade Union movement at the time, the way was left open for the savage attack on our take-home pay which is now being proposed by the Government.
-The failure by Trade Union leaders to state at every opportunity that public servants pay 6.5% of their salary for pension in addition to the 12.5% above, created the impression in the public mind that Public Servants did not pay anything for their pension.
-Benchmarking has been shamefully described as the ATM for Public Servants. The first Benchmarking Report in 2002 was welcomed by IBEC who said at the time Benchmarking has brought reality into Public Service pay and has stopped leapfrogging and relativities.
-This same Benchmarking process replaced our traditional pay review mechanism.
-The Rolls Royce Public Service pensions referred to by Turlough OSullivan is as follows:
Public Service retire on pension of €500 per week after 40 Years service does not get the State Pension of €230 per week. Thus the real additional benefit of the Rolls Royce, after working for 40 years, is 270 per week, NOT 500. Out of this, the pensioner pays VHI, including the levy of 128, and the new 1% income levy (equivalent to 400 per annum).
-The separation of the link between Public Service pay and pensions, evident again in this proposed levy, must be stopped.
-We as public servants are prepared to take some of the pain of this recession, on an equitable basis, even though we did not receive the gain of the private sector during the Celtic Tiger large bonuses, company cars, expenses.
-Many public servants are on temporary contracts. This is not secure employment.
-It is offensive to Public Servants that the private sector is referred to as the real economy by Turlough OSullivan. The public sector economy is very real to people who are in hospital, children in schools
and people who are rescued by firefighters.
-Unlike a possible pay cut, the proposed pension levy will not be reversed when the economy picks up.
This information must be put into the public domain. We refuse to accept this unfair levy. We demand that our trade union leaders, who are not affected by this levy as they have private, non-contributory pensions, fight this on our behalf. We demand that our elected public representatives stop this Unfair treatment and concerted media campaign against public servants, And represent us equally and fairly as the hard-working, honest, Tax-paying citizens that we are.
Please copy and email to everybody you know, TODAY, especially your elected representatives, newspapers, television stations and your union head office. We must act quickly. Remember that ICTU entered the discussions with the Government on the basis that there will be tax increases. These will follow, and we will be hit again, to pay for a problem that we did not create."